Legal Opinion

Lopez v. Foremost Paving, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided April 25, 1984No. 04-84-00032-CVPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The primary issue presented in appellant’s motion for extension of time in which to file her appeal bond is whether the 15-day extension provided in Rule 356(b) 1 applies to cost bonds filed after the sustaining of a contest of appellant’s affidavit of inability to pay the costs of the appeal.

Appellant filed a timely affidavit of inability to pay the costs of appeal, and the district clerk responded with a contest filed on January 25,1984. There is no indication in the record that notice of the filing of the affidavit was provided appellees as required by Rule 355(b). After a hearing…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Meshwert v. MeshwertTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  2. BD CLICK CO. INC. v. Safari Drilling Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Bantuelle v. RenfroeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Ranier v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Johnson v. BargeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

4Cited by14 opinions

  1. Nguyen v. Kim, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  2. Modern Living, Inc. v. AlworthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Furr v. Furr, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1986
  4. Templo Ebenezer, Inc. v. Evangelical Assemblies, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1987
  5. Shaffer v. US Companies, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API