Legal Opinion

State v. Harris

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 2009No. 2007-1812PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

I. Introduction

{¶ 1} There are two issues before the court. The first is whether robbery under R.C. 2911.02(A)(2) and aggravated robbery under R.C. 2911.01(A)(1) are allied offenses of similar import. We are asked the same question with regard to felonious assault under R.C. 2903.11(A)(1) and felonious assault under R.C. 2903.11(A)(2). In both instances, we hold that the offenses are allied offenses of similar import, and therefore a defendant cannot be convicted of both offenses when both are committed with the same animus against the same victim. In this case, we hold that appellant,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. State v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. RanceOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. LewisOhio Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. EvansOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. DamronOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. MonfordOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. State v. RogersOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API