Miller v. Department of Taxation
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
This appeal is ruled by the decisions in the cases of Schuette v. Tax Comm. 234 Wis. 574, 292 N. W. 9, and Amerpohl v. Tax Comm. 225 Wis. 62, 272 N. W. 472.
Appellant relies heavily on Daniels v. Tearney, 102 U. S. 415, 26 L. Ed. 187, and Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State Bank, 308 U. S. 371, 60 Sup. Ct. 317, 84 L. Ed. 329, but both cases are readily distinguishable from the case at bar. The latter decision is based on res judicata and is not applicable here. In Daniels v. Tearney the plaintiff, in reliance on the defendant’s actions under the statute, changed his position to his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Daniels v. TearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Hoeper v. Tax Comm'n of Wis.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- O'BRIEN v. WheelockSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Laabs v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Department of Revenue v. Moebius Printing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Libby, McNeill & Libby v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952