Legal Opinion

Arsdale v. King

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 30, 1963No. 32054PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THORNAL, Justice.

By a petition for a writ of certiorari we are requested to review an order of the respondent Commission in a common carrier stock transfer proceeding.

We must determine whether Section 323.-10(2) authorizes the Commission to declare abandoned because of dormancy a portion of a certificate held by a non-schedule, irregular route carrier of specified commodities.

Since 1953, Florida Tank Lines, Inc. has held a certificate of public convenience and *354necessity authorizing it to transport cement and other similar commodities “between all points in Florida over irregular routes.” The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. University City Transfer Co. v. Florida Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  2. Greyhound Corp., Southeastern Greyhound Lines Division v. CarterSupreme Court of Florida · 1960

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Austin Tupler Trucking, Inc. v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Bennett v. State Corporation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Black Ball Freight Service v. Washington Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Groendyke Transport, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  5. In re Guye Line Tours, Inc.Florida Public Service Commission · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API