Black Ball Freight Service v. Washington Utilities & Transportation Commission
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
To give this case its proper setting we quote from City Sanitary Serv., Inc. v. Washington Util. & Transp. Comm’n, 64 Wn.2d 739, 741, 393 P.2d 952 (1964), as follows:
The Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission is an administrative agency, and as such is a fact-finding tribunal. Herrett Trucking Co. v. Washington Public Ser. Comm., 58 Wn. (2d) 542, 364 P. (2d) 505; State ex rel. Arrow Transp. Co. v. Washington Util. & Transp. Comm., 60 Wn. (2d) 825, 376 P. (2d) 433. Its findings of fact are by statute (RCW 81.04.430) made prima facie correct, and the burden is upon the one attacking…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Northern Pacific Transport Co. v. Washington Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Dawes v. Washington State Highway CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Herrett Trucking Co. v. Washington Public Service CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- Herrett Trucking Co. v. Washington Public Service CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- State ex rel. Arrow Transportation Co. v. Washington Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Weaver Bros., Inc. v. Alaska Transportation CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Washington Utilities & Transportation Commission v. United Cartage, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1981