Legal Opinion

Black Ball Freight Service v. Washington Utilities & Transportation Commission

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1969No. 40264PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

To give this case its proper setting we quote from City Sanitary Serv., Inc. v. Washington Util. & Transp. Comm’n, 64 Wn.2d 739, 741, 393 P.2d 952 (1964), as follows:

The Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission is an administrative agency, and as such is a fact-finding tribunal. Herrett Trucking Co. v. Washington Public Ser. Comm., 58 Wn. (2d) 542, 364 P. (2d) 505; State ex rel. Arrow Transp. Co. v. Washington Util. & Transp. Comm., 60 Wn. (2d) 825, 376 P. (2d) 433. Its findings of fact are by statute (RCW 81.04.430) made prima facie correct, and the burden is upon the one attacking…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Transport Co. v. Washington Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State Ex Rel. Dawes v. Washington State Highway CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Herrett Trucking Co. v. Washington Public Service CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Herrett Trucking Co. v. Washington Public Service CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. State ex rel. Arrow Transportation Co. v. Washington Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Weaver Bros., Inc. v. Alaska Transportation CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Washington Utilities & Transportation Commission v. United Cartage, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API