Legal Opinion

Matter of Contempt of Peisner

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 21, 1977No. 29664PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

78 Mich. App. 642 (1977)

261 N.W.2d 30

IN THE MATTER OF THE CONTEMPT OF BALFOUR PEISNER

PEOPLE

v.

JACKSON.

Docket No. 29664.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided September 21, 1977.

Alphonso R. Harper (by Rudy J. Huizenga), for the Recorder's Court Judge.

Balfour Peisner, in propria persona.

Before: BEASLEY, P.J., and V.J. BRENNAN and J.R. McDONALD,[*] JJ.

2Per curiam

During the within murder trial, the trial judge found Balfour Peisner, counsel for defendant, in contempt for willfully, persistently and repeatedly violating the ruling of the court, and fined him $150.

The trial judge is empowered to control proceedings…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. MatishMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. In Re BurnsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. People v. JacksonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. HOMESTEAD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY v. Holly Twp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. People v. WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. LittleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. People v. LittleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API