Legal Opinion
HOMESTEAD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY v. Holly Twp.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided January 30, 1989No. Docket 111221PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
Defendant, Township of Holly, ap peals by leave granted from two orders entered on August 26,1988, in this zoning case. We affirm.
Plaintiff Homestead Development Company is a general partnership which owns approximately 198 acres of undeveloped land located in Holly Township. The individual plaintiffs are all general partners in the plaintiff partnership. In December, 1978, the Holly Township Board of Trustees adopted a master plan and zoning ordinance no. 40. Under ordinance no. 40, a portion of plaintiffs’ property was zoned r (residential), while the remainder was zoned ag/re (agricultural…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Petterman v. Haverhill Farms, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. MatishMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
- In Re Contempt of DoughertyMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
- Joe Dwyer, Inc v. Jaguar Cars, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Plumbers & Pipefitters Local Union No. 190 v. WolffMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Taylor v. CurrieMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Marquiss v. MarquissWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re Contempt of RobertsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Cipri v. Bellingham Frozen Foods, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re Contempt of RochlinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.