Legal Opinion

Atkinson v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 14, 1959No. 49-56PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaddeN, Judge

The plaintiff, a veterans preference eligible, sues to recover Civil Service pay lost as a result of an alleged illegal removal for cause from his position of attorney-adviser in tbe Chicago Chemical Procurement District of the Army, effective April 3,1953.

The plaintiff contends that his removal was procedurally defective under the Veterans Preference Act of 1944,58 Stat. 390, 5 U. S. C. 863, the Performance Eating Act of 1950, 64 Stat. 1098, 5 U. S. C. 2001, Civil Service regulations, and regulations of the Department of the Army.

On August 15,1951, plaintiff received an excepted appointment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Charles S. Thomas, Secretary of the Department of the Navy v. William E. WardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  2. DeBusk v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  3. Misuraca v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Albert J. Lovshin v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  2. Alpert v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  3. Rasmussen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  4. Nigris v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  5. Angrisani v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API