Legal Opinion

Moore v. Hammons

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1889No. 13,768PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Prom the Jay Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Elliott, C. J. —

The appellee’s counsel insist that the assignment of errors is not properly in the record because it is pasted to the transcript. We regard this objection as too technical to prevail. Even before the adoption of the present rules the assigment of errors might be made part of the record by permanently attaching it to the transcript, for we *511think that when attached as a page of the transcript the assignment is “entered on the records” within the meaning of the code.

Filed June 26, 1889.

An instruction in an action by a husband for the seduction of his wife which informs the jury…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Powell v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Powell v. . StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Hart v. KnappSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
  4. Norris v. StonehamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Huber v. TielkingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API