Legal Opinion

People v. Ferrer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 8, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*316Upon examination of the transcript of the plea proceedings, we find no support for- defendant’s contention that his plea was not knowingly and voluntarily entered because he did not speak English. We note, for example, that when asked to specify what property he had stolen, defendant replied "a watch and a chain.” The minutes further reflect that defendant, who was represented by counsel throughout the plea proceedings, responded affirmatively when asked whether he understood that he was waiving certain rights, including the right to a jury trial, to have his lawyer cross-examine witnesses,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. FrederickNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. People v. RozzellNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. People v. RamirezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. People v. TorresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. People v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API