Behrens v. Milliken
South Dakota Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceKean, Circuit Judge
I agree that this case should be reversed and remanded. I believe the majority opinion adequately describes the federal preemption concepts which apply to this matter. However, I disagree with the majority *281opinion that Betty is entitled to an automatic judgment upon remand for the sum of $10,000.00 plus interest as I believe a more equitable approach should be taken based upon a more fully developed record.
Betty’s claim against the estate cannot be founded upon SDCL 20-1-2(1). This code provision states that an obligation may arise from a “contract of the parties.” But, the Settlement…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Ridgway v. RidgwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Sharp v. SharpSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Spoon-Shacket Co. v. County of OaklandMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Hanks v. HanksSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.