Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Behrens v. Milliken

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1990No. 16766Published

1ConcurrenceKean, Circuit Judge

I agree that this case should be reversed and remanded. I believe the majority opinion adequately describes the federal preemption concepts which apply to this matter. However, I disagree with the majority *281opinion that Betty is entitled to an automatic judgment upon remand for the sum of $10,000.00 plus interest as I believe a more equitable approach should be taken based upon a more fully developed record.

Betty’s claim against the estate cannot be founded upon SDCL 20-1-2(1). This code provision states that an obligation may arise from a “contract of the parties.” But, the Settlement…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Ridgway v. RidgwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Sharp v. SharpSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Spoon-Shacket Co. v. County of OaklandMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Hanks v. HanksSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API