Legal Opinion

Rouse v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 4, 1953No. Gen. 45,763PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Feinberg

Plaintiff brought this action under the Federal Employers ’ Liability Act for personal injuries allegedly due to defendant’s negligence. Upon a trial with a jury a verdict for $47,000 was returned, and after denial of defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, judgment was entered upon the verdict, and defendant appeals.

That the parties come under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act is not disputed.

On September 4,1948, about 1:30 a. m., plaintiff was the engineer on defendant’s freight train driven at a speed of approximately 30 miles per hour, in an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Bailey v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BehymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McComish v. DeSoiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  2. Foster v. VanGilderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  3. Scruggs v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1970
  4. Ellerman v. Clark Products, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  5. ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY v. McBrideSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API