Legal Opinion

Messmann v. Egenberger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 8, 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action for partition by Elizabeth Messmann against Annette Egenberger, William Egenberger, and others. From an interlocutory-judgment entered upon a referee’s report, the plaintiff and the defendant William Egenberger appeal. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtIngraham, J.

This action was brought for a partition of real property. The action was referred, by consent, to a referee,, upon whose report an interlocutory judgment was entered, and from that interlocutory judgment the plaintiff and one of the defendants appeal. There is no question of fact in dispute, the case presenting only a question of law. It appears that one Joseph A. Egenberger was seised and possessed of a lot of land in the city of New York, and that on the 21st day of June, 1891, he died, leaving a last will and testament, which was duly admitted to probate. By his will, after appointing…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kent v. HopkinsNew York Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bradford v. LeakeTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  2. In re Estate of NobleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  3. Estate of Hamlin ex rel. Lincoln Rochester Trust Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947
  4. Hamlin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947
  5. Estate of SpreckelsCalifornia Superior Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API