Legal Opinion

Estate of Spreckels

California Superior Court

Decided October 4, 1910No. 6977 (N. S.)Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

COFFEY, J.

We have here (1) an application by Claus A. and Rudolph Spreckels, executors named in the will of Claus Spreckels, for a final distribution of his estate; (2) an application by two others, John D. and Adolph B. Spreckels, alleged coheirs at law, for participation in distribution; (3) an application by an heir, Claus A., that he have an undivided portion of the property of the deceased; (4)an application by an heir, Rudolph, that he have another undivided portion; (5) an application by the trustees of Emma C. Ferris, nee Spreckels, daughter of decedent testator, that they…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of TompkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Grattan v. GrattanIllinois Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Pomeroy v. PomeroyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Whitman v. HapgoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
  5. Ludington v. PattonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API