Northen v. Mary Anne Frolick & Associates
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Judge Harold R. Banke.
Mary Anne Frolick & Associates, d/b/a Re/Max Achievers (“Re/ Max”) obtained a default judgment against Arthur J. Northen, Jr. after Northen breached a January 1995 real estate contract to purchase a $3.2 million home. The trial court imposed the default judgment as a sanction for certain discovery problems. It awarded $97,500 plus interest to Re/Max on its breach of contract claim and $1,560 in attorney fees as damages for its bad faith claim.
After entry of default, Northen retained R. Scott Tobin, who served as Northen’s counsel from May 1, 1997 until October 7, 1997.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Mitcham v. BlalockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Oden v. Legacy Ford-Mercury, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- General Motors Corp. v. ConkleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Whidby v. Columbine Carrier, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Slone v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Bircoll v. RosenthalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Southeast Recovery Services, LLC v. NorthenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002