Legal Opinion
Benjamin v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 18, 1894No. 18300PublishedCited by 2 opinions
The Reporters’ statement of tbe case: The averments of the petition demurred to are set forth in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPeelle, J.
The question involved in this case arises on the defendants’ demurrer to the petition.
The petition is as follows:
“1. That he is the original and sole owner of the claim herein stated, no part of which has ever been transferred or discharged.
“2. That prior to the 25th day of August, 1884, he was an attorney, practicing before the Treasury Department, duly admitted to and borne on the roll of the attorneys before that Department under the provisions of the statute then in force.
u3. That on or about the date above named there was delivered to him, as attorney of record in the case and by order…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Ravesies v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1886
- Sybrandt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1884
- Hall v. Board of RegentsWest Virginia Court of Claims · 1978
3Cited by2 opinions
- Patterson Steel Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- United States v. FindlayDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1913