Legal Opinion
Braunskill v. Smith
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided May 13, 2025No. 1:24-cv-00140Unknown
1Opinion
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION RALPHIELL BRAUNSKILL, Case No. 1:24-cv-140 Plaintiff, McFarland, J. Bowman, M.J. v. AGENT DANIELLE SMITH, et al., Defendants. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION On March 18, 2024, Plaintiff initiated this pro se prisoner civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case is presently before the undersigned on Defendants’ motion to dismiss. For the reasons that follow, the undersigned recommends that Defendants’ motion to dismiss be DENIED, but that the claims in the amended complaint be DISMISSED sua sponte under the PLRA. I. Background On June 11,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.