Legal Opinion
State v. Cinel
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 27, 1993No. 92-KA-0913PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
619 So.2d 770 (1993)
STATE of Louisiana
v.
Dino CINEL.
No. 92-KA-0913.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.
May 27, 1993.
Harry F. Connick, Dist. Atty., Hans P. Sinha, Asst. Dist. Atty. and Wessel, Bartels & Ciaccio, Law Corp., William F. Wessel, Victoria L. Bartels, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant State of LA.
Arthur A. Lemann, III, Martha L. Adams, Arthur A. Lemann, III & Assocs., Edwin A. Stoutz, Jr., New Orleans, and Franz L. Zibilich, Metairie, for defendant-appellant Dino Cinel.
Before KLEES, BYRNES and LOBRANO, JJ.
KLEES, Judge.
On May 21, 1991, the appellant was charged with…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Andrew Jackson RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Glen HermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Gary Thomas Rowe v. Carl Griffin, Etc., Hon. Jesse O. BryanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- State v. CashenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SwinehartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Tichenor v. Roman Catholic Church of Archdiocese of New OrleansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- State v. CinelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- United States v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Law v. City of EuniceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.