United States v. Martin
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Andrew A. Martin was convicted of unlawfully conspiring to defraud the United States by impairing the ability of the IRS to ascertain and collect income taxes in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, as well as several counts of false statements and tax evasion offenses in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 7201 and 7206(1). Martin raises three issues on appeal: the failure of the district court to hold evidentiary hearings on his motions for a Kastigar and a Franks hearing, and the jury instruction with regard to the violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. We affirm the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hammerschmidt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- United States v. Edwin Edwards Stephen Edwards Cecil Brown Andrew Martin Bobby JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. FalsoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Paul PavulakCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- United States v. DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. RamosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. TateCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.