Legal Opinion

James S. Holden Co. v. William Tait Realty Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1921No. Docket No. 13PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Hart (Burton L.), J., presiding. Bill by the James S. Holden Company against the William Tait Realty Company and others for the specific performance of a land contract. From a decree dismissing the bill, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

On August 8, 1919, the defendant William Tait Realty Company and the plaintiff entered *634into a written contract for the sale by the former to the latter of certain platted lands in the city of Detroit for the sum of $40,000. A down payment of $1,000 was then made, the balance to be paid on delivery of warranty deed and after the furnishing and examination of an abstract of title, but not later than 24 days from the date of the contract. The abstract as finally completed showed the title to the lands to be in the Winnetka Land Company, subject to a mortgage held by John Dubay securing $33,501,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eppstein v. KuhnIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Murphy v. HohneSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  3. Covell v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Nelson v. GibeMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Koontz v. Bay Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Bartos v. CzerwinskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Borkowski v. KolodziejskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Michigan Bean Co. v. Burrell Engineering & Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Kruger v. AgnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API