Legal Opinion

Radke v. Carpenter

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1978No. 418-593, SC 25066PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.

Plaintiff brought this action against defendant, a tavern owner, to recover for personal injuries sustained as a result of an altercation which occurred off defendant’s premises. The trial court entered a judgment order granting defendant’s motion for a directed verdict against plaintiff. Plaintiff appeals.

In reviewing a trial court’s action in granting or denying a motion for a directed verdict, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff to determine if there was sufficient evidence to submit the case to the jury. Turman v. Central Billing Bureau, 279 Or 443, 445, 568…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Campbell v. CarpenterOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. James v. Carnation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Turman v. Central Billing Bureau, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Peck v. GerberOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Stachniewicz v. Mar-Cam CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Precision Castparts Corp. v. Johnson & Higgins of Oregon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. Jones v. ObergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Schroer v. SynowieckiNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Higgenbottom v. NoreenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. Fitch v. AdlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API