Legal Opinion

Higgenbottom v. Noreen

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 22, 1978No. 77-1220PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge.

This fire insurance subrogation claim was tried under Oregon law, as a diversity action, and the plaintiffs, assigning error to the instructions to the jury, appeal from a judgment for the defendants. We affirm.

The Noreens occupied a dwelling house for several years before selling it to the Higgenbottoms. During the Noreen occupancy, a metal fireplace was installed in the living room.

Some weeks after the Higgenbottoms took possession, and while they were using the fireplace to burn wood, cardboard and other debris, a fire broke out somewhere above the living room…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Campbell v. CarpenterOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. James v. Carnation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Yepsen v. BurgessOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Barnum v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Loveland v. Orem City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Jon Liebsack v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. Bass v. JonesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Dorman v. Swift & Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  5. Higgenbottom v. NoreenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API