Higgenbottom v. Noreen
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWIN, Circuit Judge.
This fire insurance subrogation claim was tried under Oregon law, as a diversity action, and the plaintiffs, assigning error to the instructions to the jury, appeal from a judgment for the defendants. We affirm.
The Noreens occupied a dwelling house for several years before selling it to the Higgenbottoms. During the Noreen occupancy, a metal fireplace was installed in the living room.
Some weeks after the Higgenbottoms took possession, and while they were using the fireplace to burn wood, cardboard and other debris, a fire broke out somewhere above the living room…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Campbell v. CarpenterOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- James v. Carnation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Yepsen v. BurgessOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Barnum v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Loveland v. Orem City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1987
- Jon Liebsack v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Bass v. JonesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Dorman v. Swift & Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- Higgenbottom v. NoreenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.