Hanford v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Redick, District Judge.
Action for damages for personal injuries. The facts upon which plaintiff bases her action are, that as plaintiff approached the intersection of Twenty-fourth. and H streets, city of Omaha, intending to take a street car going south, she observed one of defendant’s cars stopping at the north side of the intersection and started running in an effort to catch it, but it started forward at about the time that she reached the east curb of Twenty-fourth street, when the motorman, perceiving her, beckoned her to come on and brought the car to a stop at the point where its rear…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Mitchell v. . Rochester Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Spade v. Lynn & Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Sloane v. Southern California Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Southern Express Co. v. ByersSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Purcell v. St. Paul City Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Orlo v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Bowles v. MaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
- Netusil v. NovakNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
- Wilfong v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1935
- Williamson v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.