Legal Opinion
David R. Browning v. Department of the Army
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 19, 2006No. 04-5219PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILMAN, Circuit Judge.
In this age-discrimination case, David Browning, a 48-year-old male, claims that the Army’s use of a matrix of job-related criteria to determine which applicant was best qualified for an open position was a pretext designed to mask a discriminatory motive. Browning worked in the Ammuni-tions Operation Division (AOD) at the Blue Grass Army Depot (BGAD) in Richmond, Kentucky as a Material Handler and Forklift Operator/Supervisor. In 1996, the BGAD Civilian Personnel Office advertised that an Explosives and Handler Supervisor position was open in the AOD. Browning…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Geiger v. Tower AutomotiveCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Tucker v. TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Jackson v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Brian J. Bender and James W. Rafferty v. Hecht's Department Stores, a Division of May EnterprisesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Richard Figueroa v. Michael PompeoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.