Legal Opinion
Queen City Park Assoc. v. Gale
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided November 1, 1938PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtButtles, J.
The plaintiff in this case is a Vermont corporation which formerly owned a tract of land in South Burlington known as Queen City Park. At some time.,prior to 1885 this tract or a portion thereof was divided into lots, and some of these lots from time to time were sold by the plaintiff to indi viduals. The propriety and regularity of such sales are not questioned. One such lot known as number 108 was sold and conveyed by the plaintiff to Elisha Allen, and another known as number 107 to A. E. Manum. Through mesne conveyances lot number 107 and five feet from the south side of lot number 108…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Stanley v. ColtSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Sohier v. Trinity ChurchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Post v. . WeilNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Bauby v. KrasowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Newbold v. Peabody Heights Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- McDonough v. WW Snow Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1973
- Albright v. FishSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- Welch v. BarrowsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1966
- Albright v. FishSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
- Olcott v. SouthworthSupreme Court of Vermont · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.