Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Delaware & Hudson Railway Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 23, 1984No. Civ. A. 83-3945PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TROUTMAN, Senior District Judge.

Presently before the Court is the defendant’s motion to transfer this F.E. L.A. action to the Northern District of New York on the basis of forum non conveniens. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), “a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought” in consideration of “the convenience of parties and witnesses [and] in the interest of justice”. Moreover, a decision to transfer is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court. Piper Aircraft Company v. Reyno, 454 U.S. 235, 257, 102…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. B. J. McAdams, Inc. v. BoggsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Blender v. SibleyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Bonnell v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Coppola v. Ferrellgas, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Fletcher v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1986
  3. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. TsapisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. First Union National Bank v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Lindley v. Caterpillar, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API