Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Mitchell

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1895PublishedCited by 6 opinions

FROM OVERTON. Appeal from Chancery Court of Overton County. B. M. Webb, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtBeard, J.

In this cause, on a former clay of the present term, a moneyed decree was rendered in favor of Mitchell against complainant, J. S. Roberts. On a still earlier day of the term, in another and independent suit, a decree was pronounced in favor of Roberts against Mitchell, and a motion is now made *278by Roberts to set off these judgments, one against the other, under § 3635 of the (M. & V.) Code. This motion is resisted by the solicitors of Mitchell, unless it be granted subject to their lien for services in obtaining the first decree. '

While the attorney’s lien upon the judgment recovered for his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Renick v. LudingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Carter v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1858
  3. Mosely & Eley v. NormanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  4. Boyer v. ClarkNebraska Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Tiffany v. StewartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. MacK v. Hugger Bros. ConstructionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929
  2. Dankwardt v. KermodeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  3. Benton v. Alcazar Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  4. Reed v. ReedMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Kansas City Rapid Motor & Transportation Co. v. YoungMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API