Tiffany v. Stewart
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Scott Gvrcuit Court. In September, 1879, the plaintiff commenced an action in the court below against the defendant, Henderson. The defendants Stewart, White and Parks, were the attorneys for Henderson, who set up a counter-claim, and, after the commencement of the action, and on the thirtieth day of Septemtember, 1879, the said attorneys served on Tiffany a notice of an attorney’s lien of $300, upon the amount set up in the counter-claim.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Scott Gvrcuit Court. In September, 1879, the plaintiff commenced an action in the court below against the defendant, Henderson. The defendants Stewart, White and Parks, were the attorneys for Henderson, who set up a counter-claim, and, after the commencement of the action, and on the thirtieth day of Septemtember, 1879, the said attorneys served on Tiffany a notice of an attorney’s lien of $300, upon the amount set up in the counter-claim. The cause proceeded to trial, and a judgment was rendered against Tiffany. An appeal was taken to this court, where the judgment was reversed…
1Opinion of the Court
Rothrock, T.
i. fobmeradimdingoniy between parties. I. The defendants contend that the matter in controversy was adjudicated by the order dissolving the injunction in the proceedings for a rule on the sheriff. This does not appear to us to be .mi i ,. . 7 , . correct, ihe real parties m interest were not *209before the court in that proceeding. Henderson had parted with all interest in the verdict and judgment by his assignments to his attorneys, and they were not parties to that proceeding. Besides, it now appears that Henderson is insolvent, and the judgments against him for costs cannot be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ballinger v. TarbellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- Bell v. Perry & TownsendSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- McConkey v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
3Cited by14 opinions
- Harris & Cole Bros. v. Columbia Water & Light Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1904
- Ward v. SherbondySupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- DeLaval Separator Co. v. SharplessSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Wildung v. Security Mortgage Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Canterbury & Gilder v. Marengo Abstract Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.