Legal Opinion

Thompson v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 14, 1980No. 79-5180PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Per curiam

The Department of Justice has a firmly established policy, known as the “Petite” policy, under which United States Attorneys are forbidden to prosecute any person for allegedly criminal behavior if the alleged criminality was an ingredient of a previous state prosecution against that person. An exception is made only if the federal prosecution is specifically authorized in advance by the Department itself, upon a finding that the prosecution will serve “compelling interests of federal law enforcement.”

In this case the Solicitor General has advised us that this established Department policy…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Abbate v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Rinaldi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Petite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Frakes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Marakar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. United States v. GaryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Daniel Basile, United States of America v. Richard DecaroCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  4. State Ex Rel. Watson v. FergusonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. United States v. Joe Louis SimpkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API