Legal Opinion

Robbins v. Resident Verify

District Court, D. Utah

Decided August 2, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00578Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION MICHAEL JOE ROBBINS, Plaintiff, ORDER AND MEMORANDUM DECISION vs. Case No. 2:20-cv-578-TC RESIDENT VERIFY, LLC, Defendant. Defendant Resident Verify, LLC, has moved the court to dismiss pro se plaintiff Michael Joe Robbins’ Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) claim with prejudice because he lacks standing under Article III of the U.S. Constitution. Resident Verify, in its Rule 12(b)(1) motion, asserts that Mr. Robbins has failed to allege facts demonstrating he has suffered a concrete injury-in- fact. For the reasons…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API