Legal Opinion

Hackney v. Birely

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1923No. 5,136PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway

The plaintiff, a farmer living near Huntley in Yellowstone county, during the winter of 1920-21 fed some sheep for Charles O’Donnell, for which services O’Donnell was unable to pay. During the following summer the subject was discussed by plaintiff and O’Donnell on a number of occasions. The upshot was that 0 ’Donnell agreed to, and later did, turn over to plaintiff 304 lambs. The plaintiff affirms these lambs were turned over to him in payment of the debt and there is testimony in the record sufficient to support a verdict in his favor upon this issue, although O’Donnell’s testimony is not…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. WinslowU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1843
  2. Frey v. CliffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Butters v. HaughwoutIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Wilson v. HarrisMontana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Wheeler & Motter Merc. Co. v. MoonMontana Supreme Court · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. First State Bank v. MussigbrodMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Yale Oil Corp. v. SedlacekMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Rasmussen v. Lee Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Selway v. DautMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  5. First Nat. Bank of Columbus v. CoitMontana Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API