Legal Opinion

Trotter v. Callens

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 1976No. 1831PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HERNANDEZ, Judge.

The plaintiffs sued the defendants, R. D. Callens and Craig Dunn, d/b/a Associated Flying Service (Flying Service.), their insurance carriers (Insurance Carriers), and Hercules, Inc. (Hercules) manufacturer of the pesticide, for personal and property damages on theories of trespass, carrying on an ultrahazardous activity, gross negligence, and nuisance. Flying Service, in turn filed a cross-claim against Hercules, alleging its liability for plaintiffs’ damages on theories of product liability, inadequate warning or labeling, negligence, and failure to test or inspect.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Delgado Ex Rel. DelgadoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Mendenhall v. VandeventerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Shephard v. Graham Bell Aviation Service, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Romero v. FelterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Apodaca v. AAA Gas Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Chamberland v. Roswell Osteopathic Clinic, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Strickland v. Roosevelt County Rural Electric CooperativeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Carraro v. Wells Fargo Mortgage & EquityNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Sewell v. WilsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API