Legal Opinion

Hauk v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 2000No. 49S00-9805-CR-262PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Justice.

Defendant Leslie Hauk was convicted of and sentenced for Murder and Robbery. She appeals, arguing that (1) the trial court improperly refused her requests to instruct the jury on the crimes of Theft and Assisting a Criminal, and (2) the trial court improperly excluded evidence of a co-defendant’s bad character. Finding the trial court’s actions proper, we affirm the trial court’s judgments.

We have jurisdiction over this direct appeal because the longest single sentence exceeds 50 years. Ind. Const, art. VII, § 4; Ind. Appellate Rule 4(A)(7).

Background

The facts most favorable…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Joyner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Bacher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Michael Inman v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Stroud v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Bald v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API