Legal Opinion

Steven Duncan v. State of Indiana

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 28, 2012No. 82A01-1201-CR-22PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBB, Chief Judge.

Case Summary and Issues

Following a bench trial, Steven Duncan was convicted of six counts of cruelty to an animal, all Class A misdemeanors. He raises three issues for our review: 1) Whether he knowingly waived his right to a jury trial; 2) Whether Indiana’s animal cruelty statute is unconstitutionally vague; and 3) Whether there was sufficient evidence to overcome a defense of necessity.

Concluding that Duncan did not knowingly waive his right to a jury trial because the trial court did not fully advise him of his rights and obligations, that the statute is not vague…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Casselman v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. West v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Poore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Hutchins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Adam Horton v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Michael Johnson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Mohamed M. Dadouch v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Shon L. Hudson v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Rodregus Morgan v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API