Lucky Dogs LLC v. City of Santa Rosa
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Lucky Dogs LLC and former plaintiff David Spangenberg brought suit against the City of Santa Rosa and others in connection with the taxes levied on Lucky Dogs and the process by which Santa Rosa imposes tax penalties. See generally FAC (dkt. 26). On September 9, 2011, the Court had an initial hearing on a motion for partial summary judgment, brought by Plaintiff (dkt. 52), a motion for…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harjo v. City of AlbuquerqueDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2018
- Deepa Patel v. City of StantonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025
- Deepa Patel v. City of StantonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2024
- Shachter v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020