Legal Opinion

Conti v. New Castle Lime & Stone Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1928No. Appeal 525PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter, P. J.,

'This is an action in trespass by plaintiff for damages alleged to have been sustained by the falling of dust on land of plaintiff, said dust arising from the pulverizing of limestone in the “Pulverizing Plant” of the defendant, located on land adjoining that of the plaintiff. The damages claimed for were for injury to the vegetation, crops and fruit growing on land of the plaintiff. The plaintiff recovered a judg ment in the court below and the appeal is by the defendant corporation.

The evidence at the trial established the following undisputed facts. The Lake Erie…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. SandersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  2. Sullivan v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. Robb v. Carnegie Bros., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Westmoreland County1891
  4. Pfeiffer v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  5. Alexander v. Wilkes-Barre Anthracite Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Buckley Motors, Inc. v. Amp, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1960
  2. Noerr v. Lewistown Smelting & Refining, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mifflin County1973
  3. Gordon Ice Co. v. Reading Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County1929
  4. Pregrad v. Ocean Coal Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Westmoreland County1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API