Legal Opinion

Neal v. Fisher

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 9, 1988No. 65, September Term, 1987PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

This case presents two questions under the 1975 Rent Escrow Act (the Act)—Md.Code (1988 Repl.Vol.), § 8-211 of the Real Property Article: 1

1. Does the District Court have jurisdiction (under § 8-211(n)(5)) to order payment of the rent escrow fund to the tenant, if the tenant has failed to request a hearing for that purpose?

2. May a court order payment of the escrow fund to the landlady (under § 8-211(n)(6)) if the tenant has failed to pay rent into the fund after the District Court has ordered the fund paid to the tenant?

We shall answer the first question in the affirmative and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Van Beeck v. Sabine Towing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Dempsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. State Ex Rel. Odham v. ShermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  5. Clark v. ElzaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Batson v. ShiflettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. NCR Corp. v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  3. Andrews & Lawrence v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  4. Pak v. HoangCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Lockett v. Blue Ocean Bristol, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API