Legal Opinion
City of Schenectady v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 10, 1987PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Kane, J. P.
On October 1, 1985, respondent Schenectady Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association (PBA) filed an improper practice charge with respondent Public Employment Relations Board (PERB). PBA alleged that petitioner had violated Civil Service Law § 209-a (1) (d) (the Taylor Law), by unilaterally implementing a procedure to be followed by police officers employed by petitioner when they applied for disability benefits under General Municipal Law § 207-c. PBA claimed that petitioner, prior to implementing the disability procedure, was required by statute to negotiate the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Incorporated Village of Lynbrook v. New York State Public Employment Relations BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Mashnouk v. MilesNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- MATTER OF CHALACHAN v. City of BinghamtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Phaneuf v. City of PlattsburghNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- Matter of Yonkers Gardens Co. v. State of New York Div. of Hous. & Cmty. RenewalNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Perez v. New York State Department of LaborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- City of New York v. District Council 37New York Supreme Court · 1999