Legal Opinion
MATTER OF CHALACHAN v. City of Binghamton
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 18, 1982PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Petitioners, formerly firemen employed by respondent City of Binghamton, became disabled as a result of injuries sustained in the performance of their duties and thus were receiving their regular salary or wages pursuant to section 207-a. of the General Municipal Law. They commenced the instant article 78 proceeding when the city rejected their demands for payment of 1979 unused vacation time, which claims were grounded upon the collective bargaining agreement between the city and its firemen and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Phaneuf v. City of PlattsburghNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- Phaneuf v. City of PlattsburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Phaneuf v. City of PlattsburghNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
3Cited by26 opinions
- Uniform Firefighters of Cohoes v. City of CohoesNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- City of Watertown v. State of New York Public Employment Relations BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- GOODWIN, ROBETTE v. PRETORIUS, M.D., RICHARDAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Willis v. Board of Selectmen of EastonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Rein v. Town of MarshfieldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.