Richmond v. Morford
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from, Superior Court,'Yakima County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Anders, C. J. —
This action was brought by respondents against appellant for the purpose of having declared void and canceled a deed of conveyance of certain town lots and agricultural lands, described in the complaint, executed by respondents to appellant, for the alleged reason that said deed was never delivered by them to appellant, and was fraudulently placed on record in the office of the county auditor of Yakima county, and constitutes a cloud upon the title of the respondents. The trial resulted in a judg*338ment for plaintiffs, and the defendant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dearmond v. DearmondIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
- Braman v. . BinghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Lawton v. SagerNew York Supreme Court · 1851
3Cited by15 opinions
- Knowles v. SlocumWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- State v. PughWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. PughWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Whitney v. DeweyIdaho Supreme Court · 1905
- Rohr v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.