Legal Opinion

Richmond v. Morford

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1892No. 435PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from, Superior Court,'Yakima County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, C. J. —

This action was brought by respondents against appellant for the purpose of having declared void and canceled a deed of conveyance of certain town lots and agricultural lands, described in the complaint, executed by respondents to appellant, for the alleged reason that said deed was never delivered by them to appellant, and was fraudulently placed on record in the office of the county auditor of Yakima county, and constitutes a cloud upon the title of the respondents. The trial resulted in a judg*338ment for plaintiffs, and the defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dearmond v. DearmondIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Braman v. . BinghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  3. Lawton v. SagerNew York Supreme Court · 1851

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Knowles v. SlocumWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State v. PughWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. PughWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Whitney v. DeweyIdaho Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Rohr v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API