Legal Opinion

City of Garland v. Louton

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1985No. C-3800PublishedCited by 125 opinions

1Per curiam

The Garland Professional Firefighters Association sought a writ of mandamus to compel the City of Garland to hold a citywide referendum on the issue of increased pay for Garland firemen. The city counterclaimed for a declaratory judgment that TEX.REV.CIV.STAT.ANN. art. 1269q violates both the Texas and United States Constitutions. The trial court issued the writ of mandamus and held article 1269q to be constitutional. The city appealed and the court of appeals dismissed the appeal from the writ of mandamus and modified the declaratory judgment by deleting the words “on the merits.” 683 S.W.2d…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. California Products, Inc. v. Puretex Lemon Juice, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. City of West University Place v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Pecos & North Texas Railway Co. v. Canyon Coal Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Wichita County v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Freeman v. BurrowsTexas Supreme Court · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by125 opinions

  1. Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Kerry Heckman, on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Williamson CountyTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Patterson v. Planned Parenthood of Houston and Southeast Texas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Rusk State Hospital v. BlackTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Camarena v. Texas Employment CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1988

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API