Legal Opinion · Dissent

Samuel Reiter Painting Co. v. Bill Miedler Homes, Inc.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 7, 1978No. Docket 77-2251Published

1DissentN. J. Kaufman, P.J.

I must respectfully dissent.

In construing a statute (or court rule), words are to be given their ordinary meanings unless a different interpretation is indicated. Goethal v Kent County Supervisors, 361 Mich 104, 111; 104 NW2d 794 (1960), Hunn v Madison Heights, 60 Mich App 326, 332; 230 NW2d 414 (1975). Specifically, the word "shall” means that the statute or court rule is mandatory — unless other considerations compel a contrary conclusion. Lundberg v *80Corrections Commission, 57 Mich App 327, 329; 225 NW2d 752 (1975). In the case at bar, a contrary conclusion is indicated.

The Committee Notes…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Goethal v. Kent County SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Hunn v. City of Madison HeightsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Lundberg v. Corrections CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Beyerlein v. AshburnMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Michigan Bean Co. v. Burrell Engineering & Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API