Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Beerheide v. Suthers

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 11, 2002No. 00-1086Published

1ConcurrenceOwen, District Judge

I am one with the majority holding that a prison inmate with sincerely-held religious beliefs should, under normal circumstances, receive meals that conform to those beliefs. Here, the three plaintiff inmates have satisfied the prison authorities of the sincerity of their beliefs and in *1193their facility are receiving such meals. What compels this concurring opinion is the majority’s giving minimal credit to the Colorado Department of Corrections’ (DOC) perception of the problems this creates and accordingly the institutional need for its regulation imposing a 25% co-pay on a kosher-receiving…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Beerheide v. SuthersDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API