Legal Opinion
Beerheide v. Suthers
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided January 31, 2000No. Civil Action 95-B-2325, 95-B-2326, 95-B-2481PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MODIFIED FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
In these consolidated cases brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Plaintiffs, Charles E. Beerheide, Sheldon Perlman, and Allen Isaac Fistell (collectively, Plaintiffs), inmates in the custody of the Colorado Department of Corrections (DOC), claim that the Defendants, all employees of the Colorado Department of Corrections (DOC), are violating their constitutional rights to: 1) free exercise of their religion as guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution by failing to provide kosher meals…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- O'Lone v. Estate of ShabazzSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Beerheide v. SuthersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Gartrell v. AshcroftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Leroy A. Lovelace v. Jack Lee Gene Shinault K. LesterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Beerheide v. SuthersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Beerheide v. SuthersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.