People v. Girr
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the County Court of Lake County. The defendant was convicted of an assault with an intent to commit rape. He appealed from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial. The other facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court :
The indictment states that the defendant “ did willfully, feloniously, and of his malice aforethought commit an assault upon the person of Caroline Waldfogal, with intent her, the said Caroline Waldfogal, then and there to rape.” The demurrer, on the ground, among others, that the facts stated in the indictment do not constitute a public offense, was overruled.
The Penal Code, sec. 220, provides that “ every person who assaults another, with intent to commit rape,” is punishable as therein provided. But the offense is not particularly described.
It has repeatedly been held that an…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- People v. ShaberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. AmmermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. BlankenshipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- People v. TomlinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- People v. BurnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- People v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.