Ceco Steel, Inc. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PRYOR, Senior Judge:
Petitioners, the employer and its insurer, seek review of a decision rendered by the Department of Employment Services (DOES) which imposed financial responsibility upon the employer, pursuant to the D.C. Workers’ Compensation Act, D.C.Code § 36-301 et seq. (1988 Repl.), for medical expenses incurred by an employee for treatment of work-related injuries. The precise issue presented is whether the administrative agency, DOES, correctly interpreted the pertinent statute, D.C.Code § 36-307(b)(3) (1988 Repl.), in allowing the employee to obtain treatment from a second…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Medical Associates of Capitol Hill v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sibley Memorial Hospital v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- C & P Telephone Co. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Washington Hospital Center v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Velasquez v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Wiley v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.