Legal Opinion

Ceco Steel, Inc. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 1989No. 88-555PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRYOR, Senior Judge:

Petitioners, the employer and its insurer, seek review of a decision rendered by the Department of Employment Services (DOES) which imposed financial responsibility upon the employer, pursuant to the D.C. Workers’ Compensation Act, D.C.Code § 36-301 et seq. (1988 Repl.), for medical expenses incurred by an employee for treatment of work-related injuries. The precise issue presented is whether the administrative agency, DOES, correctly interpreted the pertinent statute, D.C.Code § 36-307(b)(3) (1988 Repl.), in allowing the employee to obtain treatment from a second…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Medical Associates of Capitol Hill v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sibley Memorial Hospital v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. C & P Telephone Co. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Washington Hospital Center v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Velasquez v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Wiley v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API