Legal Opinion

Mack v. Augusta Belt Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 24, 1922No. 13165PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action for-damages; from Richmond superior court — Judge Henry C. Hammond. November 16, 1921.

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

I. In a suit against a railroad company to recover damages occasioned by the burning of the plaintiff’s house, where the petition alleges that the fire was caused by sparks from “ an ” engine of the defendant, and the petition contains no allegation that the fire was caused by sparks from a specifie engine of the defendant, it is permissible to show that it was a common thing for engines of the defendant, in passing near the house of the plaintiff, to emit sparks; thus showing habitual negligence upon the part of the defendant in permitting its engines to emit sparks at the place in question,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railroad v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Ashley v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Inman & Co. v. Elberton Air-Line RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Livingston v. Epsten-Roberts Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  2. Staten v. General Exchange InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. StuddardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  4. Comer v. Rome Chevrolet Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  5. Fender v. Lee CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API