Mack v. Augusta Belt Railway Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action for-damages; from Richmond superior court — Judge Henry C. Hammond. November 16, 1921.
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
I. In a suit against a railroad company to recover damages occasioned by the burning of the plaintiff’s house, where the petition alleges that the fire was caused by sparks from “ an ” engine of the defendant, and the petition contains no allegation that the fire was caused by sparks from a specifie engine of the defendant, it is permissible to show that it was a common thing for engines of the defendant, in passing near the house of the plaintiff, to emit sparks; thus showing habitual negligence upon the part of the defendant in permitting its engines to emit sparks at the place in question,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railroad v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Ashley v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Inman & Co. v. Elberton Air-Line RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
3Cited by7 opinions
- Livingston v. Epsten-Roberts Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Staten v. General Exchange InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. StuddardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Comer v. Rome Chevrolet Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Fender v. Lee CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.