Legal Opinion
Donahue v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 16, 1952No. 4208_1PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Circuit Judge.
Section 103-4 — 8, Utah Code Annotated 1943, provides among other things that any one who uses for advertising purposes or for purposes of trade the name, portrait, or picture of a person, if such person is living, without first having obtained the written consent of such person, or, if such person is dead, without the written consent of his heirs or personal representatives, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. And section 103-4 — 9 provides in presently material part that any living person, or the heirs or personal representatives of any deceased person, whose name,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Pavesich v. New England Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Roberson v. . Rochester Folding Box Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Sidis v. FR Pub. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Binns v. Vitagraph Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Gutierrez v. CollinsTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Maybruck v. HaimDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Transport Indemnity Co. v. Financial Trust Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1972
- Donahue v. Warner Bros. Pictures Distributing Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1954
- Raymond Day v. United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local 36 of Uaw, and Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.