Legal Opinion

Judkins v. HT WINDOW FASHIONS CORP.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 8, 2010No. Civil Action 07-0251PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

GARY L. LANCASTER, Chief Judge.

This is an action in patent infringement. On November 12, 2009, a jury found that HT willfully infringed one of Judkins’s patents and awarded him $154,776.04 in damages. The jury also found that HT would infringe another of Judkins’s patents if it began selling a different product. The jury rejected HT’s contentions that both of Judkins’s patents were invalid and/or unenforceable.

Before the court are various post-trial motions:(1) Judkins’s Motion for a Permanent Injunction [doc. no. 220] and HT’s Motion to Strike the Declarations that Judkins filed in…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. Kolon Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
  2. Broomer v. MayDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API