Legal Opinion

Wead v. Lutz

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 2005No. CA2004-12-022PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bkessler, Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, John Wead, as administrator of the estate of Angela Lutz, appeals the decision of the Fayette County Court of Common Pleas, Probate Division, ordering the sale of real estate subject to a finding that defendant-appellee, GMAC Mortgage Corporation (“GMAC”), possessed a valid and secured mortgage on the land. We affirm the trial court’s decision. 1

{¶ 2} On February 11, 2002, Angela Lutz purchased real property in Blooming-burg, Ohio. Lutz signed a note in the amount of $87,516 with Alligriff Mortgage Corporation, Inc. She secured the note by a mortgage…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Goodson v. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Krahn v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. National Amusements, Inc. v. City of SpringdaleOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Bell v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Whittiker v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
  2. State ex rel. Coles v. GranvilleOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Noland v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. (In Re Williams)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
  4. In re Estate of ThomasOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Mayberry v. Chevalier, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Hocking County2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API